Posted on February 23, by Scott Alexander [Content warning: Discussion of social justice, discussion of violence, spoilers for Jacqueline Carey books. This post was inspired by a debate with a friend of a friend on Facebook who has since become somewhat famous.
A Journal of Mormon Scripture 4 I understand that some doubts have arisen in your mind. Probably I have entertained some of them in my own mind. And perhaps I still harbor some of them myself. I am not going to respond to them in the ways that you may have anticipated. Oh, I will say a few things about why many doubts felt by the previously faithful and faith-filled are ill-founded and misplaced: But my main purpose in writing this letter is not to resolve the uncertainties and perplexities in your mind.
I want, rather, to endow them with the dignity and seriousness they deserve. And even to celebrate them. That may sound perverse, but I hope to show you it is not. So, first, a few words about doubts that are predicated on misbegotten premises.
The example comes from B. From his first experience debating a Campbellite minister on the Book of Mormon inRoberts was devoted to defending the Mormon scripture.
While in England as a Church mission president in andhe studied in the Picton [Page ]Library, collecting notes on American archeology that could serve as external evidence in support of the Book of Mormon. The three volumes of the work that resulted, New Witnesses for God, appeared in, and The brief letter sounded routine enough.
Would you kindly answer them and send them to me. Roberts, expecting a quick and routine reply. Four of the questions dealt with anachronisms that were fairly easily dismissed by anyone who understands a little about translation theory. But one had Roberts stumped.
It was this question: In late December, he wrote the President of the Church, explaining the delay and asking for more time: As I proceeded with my recent investigations, however, and more especially in the, to me, new field of language problems, I found the difficulties more serious than I had thought for; and the more I investigated the more difficult I found the formulation of an answer to Mr.
But here is the lesson we should learn from this story. In fact, as John Sorenson has conclusively demonstrated, the entire history of the Book of Mormon takes place within an area of Nephite and Lamanite habitation some five hundred miles long and perhaps two hundred miles wide or a little smaller than Idaho.
And though, as late asthe Book of Mormon introduction written by Bruce R. His descendants occupied a small geographical area and intermingled [Page ]and intermarried with other peoples and cultures.
And there was absolutely no reason to try to make that square peg fit into that round hole. You see, even brilliant individuals and ordained Seventies can buy into careless assumptions that lead them astray. That Joseph Smith at some point entertained similar notions about Book of Mormon geography only makes it more imperative for members not to take every utterance of any leader as inspired doctrine.
I will mention five: I can only say a few words about each but enough, I hope, to provoke you to consider if these—or kindred misplaced foundations—apply to you.
Moses took glory unto himself at the waters of Meribah and lost his ticket to the promised land as a result. He was also guilty of manslaughter and covered up his crime. Paul rebuked Peter sharply for what he called cowardice and hypocrisy in his refusal to embrace the gentiles as equals.
Then Paul got into a sharp argument with fellow apostle Barnabas, and they parted company. So where on earth do we get the notion that modern-day prophets are infallible specimens of virtue and perfection?
Most telling of all is section Air-brushing our prophets, past or present, is a wrenching of the scriptural record and a form of idolatry.Post-truth (a.k.a. Post-truth politics) is a political culture that focuses more on appeal to emotion and other logical fallacies — instead of factual investigation and reporting — that sways the public's opinion, and is used all across the spectrum, from wingnuts to moonbats and everywhere in between.
Free Essay: BY THE WATERS OF BABYLON PLANET OF THE APES COMPARITIVE ESSAY The short story by the waters of Babylon and the movie planet of the apes were both Home Flashcards Flashcards Home They have to learn the truth piece by piece because the truth is hard to swallow.
In the movie planet of the apes the main character is an astronaut. Hidden Hand Interview With Hidden Hand, Alleged Ruling Bloodline Priest "Remember, always, that this is a beautiful game that we are playing here and co-creating together with our Infinite Creator. There’s varying levels of walled gardens, to take the metaphor way too far.
You could talk at a friendly and superficial level to a wife-and-seven-kids coworker that treats his family as . The Truth Essay. Words 3 Pages.
or maybe we just don’t want to tell how we handled the situation so we remove our part or change our part from the truth. Telling the truth is hard, we never know how the opposite side will react on the truth. It makes us insecure to tell the truth, we don’t want to be in a position where we can be.
One of the most influential and prolific organizations within Calvinistic circles is The Banner of Truth Trust.
In addition to its magazine, The Banner of Truth, it has published a host of books by past and present professedly Reformed authors.
Any new book by The Banner of Truth Trust is sure to go to the top of the Reformed best-seller list.