Most of us believe that almost all big organisations would have definitely moved to some form of managed service model. Thus, I thought it would be interesting to understand staff augmentation and managed services models in detail and also illustrate how an organisation can gradually move to a managed service model. Kearney Is the Staff Augmentation model seeing the end of the journey?
Full-cycle software development company. Latest company and industry news. Existek is a custom software development company helping our customers to solve their business challenges with best in its class software. Contact us to get an instant and free expert consultation about your custom software development project.
It is a common situation when the company who are seeking for some assistance in non-profile areas evaluates staff augmentation vs managed services. After all, anyone who has ever been engaged in the time sensitive project with large financial investments understands the importance of the sufficienntly stuffed team.
Lack of well-trained professionals can complicate even routine tasks. Here we are going to take a look at the external assistance that is required almost to every company on one or another stage of the workflow.
Business plan for staff augmentation vs managed most well-known approach of the external service methods is outsourcing which is often accompanying outstaffing. IT outsourcing — is a practice of complete delegation of some component of the development process. The variety of the outsourced services is huge and you may find anything that development implies: So, what should the company do if there are no internal resources deal with an issue?
How to advance the project if it is too risky to look for the outsourcing contractor at the moment? The solution exists in two incarnations: Both of them bear the resemblance of the outstaffing and outsourcing, but the differences are still notable. Here we will try to help you with the decision of what solution is better among the competition of staff augmentation vs managed services.
The only difference is that unlike simple hiring, the staff augmentation reckons only a temporary use of the resources, analogically to the outsourcing. You will need the highly-qualified and narrowly-aimed professionals for the work to be done, or improve that what you already have only sometimes.
Here are key advantages for the staff augmentation. With the staff augmentation you pay only for the required work when you need it, and for the expected skills at the right time.
Paying no full-time wages annually companies save huge financial resources each of the short-time and the long-time perspective. The adaptivity — is a great feature that helps reach top lines in your business area.
This is very simple to increase the intensity of your team with the augmented staff.
Project manager simply monitors of who is allocated to the important work, who is on the minor tasks and who is working on the critical issues.
Controlling the process — is controlling the quality of the end product. Giving all the responsibility for the development to the outsourcer, you lower the control and status monitoring almost to the very end of the development.
Augmenting your staff you basically do the same thing as the outsourcing, but you keep it in-house: As the attrition in IT sphere is inevitable during the economic upturn, the augmented staff will fill your need for software engineers.
However, the perfection of this model is accompanied by the disadvantages as well: You will never find the universal all-knowing team for the reasonable price, so it can happen that the augmented staff will need some additional knowledge to get done with that or another task.
And that requires the education which means additional time and finance expenses. If there are some flaws in the internal company processes, the additional expenses for the staff augmentation may harm each of the in-house team and the company workflow overall.
The companies who use the staff augmentation, are only getting the resources.
Ideally, the company is getting top-quality resources, but not the result. Managed services — is the permanent control, feedback and high level of business adaptation. Here we should clarify: The classic definition offered by analytic agencies and some vendors is: In this very context, the client-company is not only sourcing the maintenance of the system but completely delegates full control of it: It varies only by the amount of the services requested and additional options.
Individual prices are determined in the case of the big-volume or non-standard project. The disadvantages of the managed services are similar somehow to those related to the staff augmentation or outsourcing: The first and main risk in the managed services is the vendor reliability.
As like the outsourcing, the client puts his resources to the risk, having no major influence on the workflow. The most secure fact that helps to avoid such risk are recommendations and comments from the previous clients.
All these instruments are not so simple, cheap and fast to get.staff augmentation, as in permanent stafﬁng, is the individual person.
Success or failure tends to be measured at the task level, and is depen-dent on speciﬁc staff. Because of this focus, when it contracts for staff augmentation, IT faces many of the same risks that it does with its own.
output- and outcome-based service delivery and commercial models 5 The service delivery model refers to the terms of engagement .
Below, we present of few arguments for why a managed services model versus staff augmentation is the best choice for many businesses: A managed services model takes a proactive rather than reactive approach to managing a business’s IT infrastructure.
Staff Augmentation vs. Managed Services. Annie Bustos augmented staff instead of tasking internal team members who hold the proper knowledge and deeper context about the business. Staff.
Staff Augmentation. In Staff Augmentation, you bring qualified and skilled workers from an agency that provides you with staff. They will work alongside your own . Firms can either choose a “staff augmentation” approach where outside workers join the existing team, or a “managed service” framework that matches traditional project-centric outsourcing.
Let’s discuss both models and how to choose the best fit for your business.